Title Required
RSS Channel: Comments on: Going FAST(er)! A 5.3L LS Intake Manifold Comparison Test
An Automotive Blog from Summit Racing
Generator:SimpleRSS ver 0.4 (BlueHippo) Release 1
Docs:http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss

By: Jj
I wonder how much of the top end gains were just the larger throttle body? It would be interesting to see if a 90mm plus throttle could be grafted to the truck intake? Maybe even a slight bore out of the manifold opening? Might be much closer then to the LSXR top end power figures?

By: Stefen Munford
In reply to <a href="https://www.onallcylinders.com/2023/03/24/going-faster-a-5-3l-ls-intake-manifold-comparison-test/#comment-377961">Stefen Munford</a>. Thanks for the info in the video, I thought the article was where the info was.

By: Stefen Munford
Could you provide access to the Comparison data for the various truck manifolds? I understand that FAST probably volunteered the manifolds and perhaps gave you some funding. I am trying to work on a budget that is lower than $3000-4000 for the fuel whole system, and I have most of the parts except the intake manifold, fuel rails and injectors. I tried to order the FAST intake fuel kit, but a year later it still never came... I have changed the tact per a local tuner suggestion and I am trying to go with changing just the intake manifold, fuel rails and injectors. But the fuel rails may not change from my 1999 Chevy LS extended cab 4x4 truck.

By: Punisher
It's not budget, it's C.A.R.B. actually preventing us from going overboard on tuning our cars and trucks!

By: Frank
I thought this was going to be a comparison of different intake manifolds, not just stock truck and the fast. Disappointing